First note taken in personal notebook from 2009:
After encountering himself and the world, man defines himself and is thus nothing until he makes something out of his own definition - his essence......he is condemned to be free.
Written in the margin of page 71 of The Birth of Tragedy, some time in 2007:
Eternal conflict between the theoretical and tragic :: Death of Tragedy caused by the dialectics of knowledge and scientific optimism :: Myth annihilated by science :: Music reproduces myth in itself
The externalization of the worker in his product means not only that his labor becomes an object, an external existence, but that it exists outside of him, independently of him and also alien to him, and confronts him as an autonomous power. -Henri Lefebvre, Critique of Everyday Life
I would like to, ideally over time, apply the inherent contradictions of political economy and commodified labor to the residually intrinsic affect-modulations of art production as utility and practice in social critical theory. These residuals being either a cogent and fulfilling rigorous critique of mass culture that elevates awareness of the now particle-like multitude of ghostly repressive apparatuses (so that we can abolish them of course - it's not all malaise over here), or a spiral toiling of art experimentation that may induce an aimless vagrancy of self (ok back to the malaise).
Lefebvre's assessment of the labor/product power relation allows us to consider the transference and fluidity of the product's autonomy as a commodified force in the ether of mass labor divisions. The kindling to that autonomy appears at first to be the work, which is to say the inherent disenfranchising nature of labor and production of substance. When applied to the production of art, - as I feel there is ubiquity to this theory of productive alienation - is it impossible to produce something then that does not abolish the autonomy of they who created it? This is assuming the piece is not inducted into the public realm. The relationship between author and authored begins insulated and pure but convention states it lacks value unless it is peered at by others. It is therefore throwing the product of the work into the fold of public interpretation that divorces the autonomy of the art-laborer over the art-product. This can perhaps be seen as troublesome OR an opportunity to allow the work to be self-aware and subsequently critical of the very public life that unwinds the original dynamics of art production. Perhaps we should force the legitimizing public view to gaze at the very labor that it disenfranchises; by way of content distortions, self-aware discordance and playful surrealism.
The above titled will indicate transcription of notes, quotations or reflections tweezed out of context from the deep cuts of old notebooks, infinitesimal book margins or salvaged scraps of paper.
First installment; taken from personal notebook; written sometime in Summer 2012:
"Crisis can arise through barriers within and between these activity spheres (what barriers or limits sprouted the current crisis?)"